Part I The Fight Against Child Labor in Brazil Report on Two Successful Experiences
Child Labor in Brazil : A Brief History
Brazil’s experience in eradicating child labor is
unique. In the eighties, a strong movement to make the legislation
concerning children and adolescents more protective focused
on concern for children living on the streets of large cities.
It was believed that it was better for them to be working
than out committing crimes or taking drugs. In the nineties,
some social movements began to challenge this thinking,
recognizing the radical difference between the ways wealthy
children were treated and the proposed ‘solution’
for the children of the poor. Society began to realize that
all children should have the same rights and access to protection
by the state. With the approval, in 1990, of new legislation
under the Statute of the Child and Adolescent, these ideas
began to be accepted. The view that "A Child’s
Place is in School" gained support across broad segments
of society and the movement in favor of eradication of child
labor began to grow.
The National Forum for the Prevention and Eradication of
Child Labor was created in 1994, under the Ministry of Labor,
with the support of the International Labor Office (ILO)
and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). The
Forum’s structure relied on the participation of representatives
from workers’ and employers’ organizations,
the federal government and NGOs. It provided a direct channel
for debate and criticism of the government, channeling the
demand for effective action to fight child labor.
In 1995, governor Cristovam Buarque launched the Bolsa-Escola
(School Grant) program in the Federal District. The idea,
which had its origins in a 1987 initiative of the Center
for Studies of Contemporary Brazil in the University of
Brasilia, was to pay a minimum wage to low income families
to keep their children at school and out of employment.
It proved to be a very efficient strategy. During the four
years of Buarque’s mandate, the Federal District government
managed to reach 25.680 families, or 50.673 children, at
a cost of less than 1% of the annual budget. The Bolsa-Escola
program was widely discussed, giving rise to pressure on
the federal government to adopt it.
In 1996, the Child Labor Eradication Program (PETI) was
established. This federal program initially aimed at removing
children from charcoal production in the state of Mato Grosso
do Sul through the strategy of supplementing family incomes
by R$25 (US$7), so that children exploited at work could
attend school. In its first year, the program benefited
about 2,000 children and it currently reaches 800,000 children
in all the states of the federation. Brazil ratified ILO
Conventions 138 and 182 in 1999 and set the minimum age
for work at 16, allowing apprenticeship from the age of
14. According to data from the Brazilian Institute of Geography
and Statistics (IBGE), about 3.8 million children in the
5 to 15 age bracket are still employed, some 10% of the
age bracket. Of these, about 59% work in the farming sector.
In addition to PETI, the federal Bolsa-Escola program was
created in 2001, reaching almost 8.7 million children in
the 6 to 15 age bracket, from 5.1 million families with
a per capita income of no more than R$90 (US$25) a month.
The government transfers R$15 (US$4.5) a month for each
child attending basic education, up to three children per
family, totaling R$45 (US$13). The challenge now is to increase
this amount and integrate the program’s actions with
PETI and other government programs.
The Background of Child Mission (Missão
Criança)
The non-profit organization, ‘Child Mission’,
was created in December 1998, with the goal of establishing
the Bolsa-Escola throughout the country and raising society’s
awareness of the issue of child labor and the importance
of school as an instrument of social inclusion.
In spite of its small structure, Child Mission has always
been bold. At the state level, it aimed to influence the
decisions of the local government in order to prevent the
interruption of the program. Despite opposition, it contributed
to raising the awareness of mothers receiving the Bolsa-Escola,
who were about to be cut off and were motivated to defend
their rights. At the federal level, its main objective was
to make the government adopt the program nation-wide, since
the Bolsa-Escola’s effectiveness had already been
proven in the states and municipalities where it had been
established. The complete strategy had already been handed
to the President of the Republic in 1994, but there was
no interest in implementing it. New efforts, in 1998, also
failed.
Child Mission has throughout defended the principle that
it would be possible to keep children at school if some
sort of income transfer or direct payment were made to the
families. At the same time, it managed to establish its
anchor-program, the Bolsa-Escola Cidadã, in seventeen
municipalities, and also obtained international recognition.
This strengthened the importance of the program, so much
so that it was recommended by the UNO as an effective tool
to be adopted by governments.
In Brazil, various organizations were already fighting
child labor, and they managed to mobilize several NGOs and
government agencies in defense of children’s right
to attend school. Thus, at the end of 2001, the Bolsa-Escola
program was established in Brazil as a federal public policy,
seven years after the proposal was presented. In addition,
the project reaches three hundred families abroad in Mozambique,
Sao Tome and Principe, Tanzania, Guatemala and El Salvador,
all with private funding. The funding of projects abroad
relies on the contribution of ‘Action Aid’ and
the ‘Parthenor Trust’.
The Objectives and Target-Group of Child
Mission
The major aim of Child Mission is to contribute to the
social inclusion of children and adolescents through education.
The organization followed the design implemented by the
Government of the Federal District, adopting as basic criteria
for receiving the Bolsa-Escola:
Per capita family income must not
exceed R$90 (US$57) a month.
Each family receives from R$50 (US$15)
up to R$200 (US$57) when all children from 6 to 16 attend
school. The details are defined by the financing agent,
which establishes the number of beneficiaries and the
amount to be granted to each family.
The children must be enrolled in the
public education network and must attend at least 90%
of classes, other than in cases of justified absence.
The mothers are primarily responsible
for supervising their children’s school work and
are authorized to receive the grant, since culturally
they show most commitment and responsibility.
Contrary to common belief, the program never aimed to remove
children from the streets, but was seen as a powerful instrument
in preventing the problem. Child Mission has believed since
its beginning that the Bolsa-Escola addresses two basic
issues: it guarantees the right of every child to education
and fights child labor, since it is understood that if a
child drops out of school in order to work, it is due to
economic need and a matter of family survival:
“Some families have a lot of children, so they
take a ten or eleven year- old and send her to work as a
maid for a family. The child gets no education and works
because of need”. (statement of the mother of a child
who entered the program)1
Child Mission’s target group are children and adolescents
in the 6 - 16 age bracket and their families. The intended
goal, of a thousand families, has already been exceeded,
reaching 1,173 families at the end of 2001. Today, 953 families
take part in the program. There is no intention of increasing
this number, since this would make it difficult to maintain
quality.
Another important objective of the organization is to promote
social mobilization and raise awareness. The awareness-raising
actions are permanently promoted and focus on partner non-government
organizations, local managers of the program, families and
teachers, through the Voluntary Missions.
Operation and Strategy
Child Mission took as its starting point the strategy originally
applied by the Federal District government, and intended,
at first, only to provide technical and institutional support
for improving projects developed by municipalities and states.However,
it developed its own program, called Bolsa Escola Cidadã,
with the participation of international organizations, the
private sector, trade unions and individual contributors.
It has a team of twelve people in charge of the technical
and administrative areas. There are also eleven technicians
responsible for action. Specific training has been developed
for managers, mothers and teachers.
Family - School Integration
A local NGO is selected to manage the project, and information
on the children’s performance and attendance is forwarded
monthly to the managing organization by the mothers. The
NGO reports to Child Mission which children met the attendance
criterion, thereby authorizing the payment. This guarantees
family participation, since mothers have to visit school
to check their children’s attendance. At the same
time, they are given information about learning and relationship
problems. The unease of the mothers, many of whom are illiterate,
has been overcome, and they no longer feel embarrassed going
to the school, since they have an interest in information
about their children.
Thanks to prior government experience, Child Mission avoided
some problems involving family participation in the schools.
From the beginning, schools had to provide monthly information
about attendance, since the Bolsa-Escola is dependent on
at least 90% attendance. The mothers were alert to any failure
on the part of the school, because they did not want to
be left without the money. The beneficiary families and
the school became closer, and even the children’s
performance began to be discussed. In this way, external
action directly affected schools’ operation and efficiency.
Other sensitive issues came up, such as the fact that the
teachers were not adequately prepared to work with poor
children, who had several difficulties not shared by other
pupils. For example:
poor nutrition, resulting in learning
difficulties
parents unable to help their children,
because they are usually illiterate
inadequate clothing - they do not have
shoes or new, clean clothes
need for personal attention which the
teachers were not used to providing
Once these problems were detected, a process of checking
the best methods of overcoming them was initiated, as it
was not possible to interfere directly with the internal
affairs of the school. Training courses for teachers were
needed, and the action started through local partnerships.
At first, the training was carried out indirectly, showing
the overall project to managing organizations and revealing
how it might contribute to changing the reality of the region.
Next, the school directors were invited, with the aim of
showing how they are also responsible for the success of
the project and convincing them that in a short time positive
responses from the children would occur. After that, training
courses were initiated, allowing increased participation
in the conduct of the actions and making them aware of the
importance of the project in overcoming poverty. The teacher
training focuses on providing information about the program
and, later, information is provided on how to act in special
circumstances, such as dealing with children who are not
interested in school, violence and other themes that may
be suggested by teachers themselves. The courses are held
at weekends, and the teachers become agents in the process
of acceptance of these transformations.
Complementary Projects Aimed at Families and
Community
The Bolsa-Escola Cidadã program, the core project
of Child Mission, is complemented by actions for the emancipation
of families, which vary according to the characteristics
of the community where they are being applied:
Alpha Project : focuses on
adult literacy. Adult family members attend courses over
three to six months and, at the end of the course, provided
90% attendance has been achieved, Mission Child buys the
first letter that the adult writes for R$100 (US$29).
A proposal is being considered to increase this amount
to R$ 200 (US$58). The letter must have a minimum of fifteen
lines, with a free subject chosen by the student, and
must be legible.
Digital Center Project : involves
setting up computer centers in the schools. Children and
adolescents learn basic computer skills including the
use of the Internet. The centers are also open on Saturdays,
so the children can play electronic games and the computers
may be used by the community.
School Fund Project : consists
of a payment that complements the grant for children who
complete the school year successfully. The amount is one
annual minimum wage, around US$60 per child. The money
is deposited in a savings account. and the mother can
withdraw 50% when the child concludes 4th grade, 50% on
completion of 8th grade, and the remaining balance on
finishing high school, that is, after eleven years of
schooling. The total amount is approximately R$2.800 (US$800)
for the children who complete their studies. For a low
income family, this means the realization of a life project,
as it allows them to set up a small business. If the family
has more than one child in the project, the amount is
multiplied, since the money is deposited for each child.
The Book Trunk Project : consists
of a wooden trunk full of books that circulates in the
community, stopping at each home for a time to give family
members access to the books. The aim is to encourage the
habit of reading among parents and children. The local
partner organization is responsible for the circulation
of the trunk, and the books come from donations. This
project has been very successful, but it is sometimes
difficult to remove the trunk from the houses because
families get so used to it.
Pedagogical Support Project : is a type of study guidance, provided by pupils in the
more advanced grades to younger pupils who are behind
in some subjects. The pupils who work in the project also
get a monthly grant of R$40 (US$10).
Consultation
Through the digital inclusion project,
the organization receives criticism and suggestions from
the children by e-mail. This alternative is not in operation
in all the municipalities, but the aim is to extend it
all over.
‘Voluntary Missions’ where
a group of people, linked mainly to the funding partnerships,
takes part in a set of activities promoted for the children,
families or teachers. Topics like health and hygiene,
sexual education, citizenship and others are debated by
the community.
Funding and Sustainability
Child Mission receives no federal government funds. In
addition to strategic partners such as UNICEF, USAID and
UNESCO, Child Mission relies on the financial support of
fifty-nine private companies and about three hundred individuals,
who provide funds for grants in the various regions of Brazil.
It attracts resources through ‘Transparent Financial
Management’, by which all potential collaborators
are given thorough information regarding financial management.
All the revenues come from bank deposits, which facilitates
auditing. Companies and individuals can make deposits, and
some choose to have their contributions deducted directly
from their salary. A ‘judicial account’ allows
the Mission to receive indemnities from judicial decisions
favorable to former-governor Cristovam Buarque. To raise
more funding, Child Mission undertakes institutional campaigns,
hands out folders, issues monthly reports and publicizes
its actions through its website, www.missaocrianca.org.br
Resources are allocated as follows: 60% for grant payments
to mothers, 6% to the managing NGOs, 12% for complementary
actions (see below), 6% to the Contingency Fund, 6% for
the Bolsa Escola Fund and 10% to administration. The Bolsa
Escola Fund guarantees payment of the grant even if donors
leave, allowing time to find a substitute and ensuring sustainability.
The grant payments are made by check, postal money order
or cash, according to local circumstances.
Positive Impacts and Results
Studies and evaluations show that the Bolsa Escola represents
an efficient strategy to place poor children in school and
remove them from child labor, a fact that directly results
in better living conditions in the future. The common conclusion
is that the program addresses core issues differently from
other public policies with only superficial reach. An evaluation
financed by UNESCO in 1996 showed that, in addition to virtually
eliminating the problem of school drop-out, the children
who receive the grant repeat grades less frequently. Other
institutions such as UNICEF, ILO, UNCTAD and the World Bank
have already referred to the program as an excellent instrument
of social inclusion for poor countries.
Several NGOs have undertaken studies showing that countless
significant positive impacts have occurred in the areas
where Child Mission works, not only within the families
but in the wider community. The most recent study revealed
some surprising results:
Improved nutrition of the families
in the program compared with other poor families. Program
families have a malnutrition level of up to 15%, compared
with around 23% for non-participants. It has been demonstrated
that 55% of the resources the families receive is invested
in food.
Generation of employment and income
through the expansion of the local shops by about 30%,
especially in the food and clothing sectors.
Families benefited by the program really
are the poorest in the communities, indicating that the
selection criteria applied by local managers are efficient.
A significant reduction in domestic
violence, explained by a closer relationship between parents
and children. Family solidarity has parents demanding,
in a healthy way, that the children attend school. Mistreatment
previously suffered by the child no longer occurs, because
those responsible would easily be discovered by the school.
Improvement of the parents’ level
of schooling.
Improvement in the quality of education
offered by the formal school.
Increased self-esteem of women and
their power within the family.
Promotion of the defense of children’s
and adolescents’ rights in a broad sense.
Reduction in the rates of migration
between municipalities.
Global reduction of poverty rates.
Full and final evaluation will only be possible after at
least eight years: the time needed for a child to complete
basic education and acquire the necessary skills to enter
the work market in a fairer and more competitive way. Since
average schooling in Brazil lasts for only four years, against
fifteen in developed countries, it can be concluded that
enrollment and continuity in school are instruments that
can breach exclusion and poverty. The addition of a few
years of schooling eliminates the component that contributes
most to continuing poverty. Children who remain in school,
at least until the end of middle level education, will be
better equipped than their parents and grandparents, who
never had the same chance.
Factors Hindering the Development of the Strategy
Adopted by Child Mission
A limiting factor that is hard to deal with is related
to the lack of commitment with which voluntary work is carried
out. The number of people willing to engage in this type
of work is still small in Brazil. There is no volunteer
culture in the country. Those who do engage in this activity
often do not take it up as a serious commitment. It is extremely
difficult to develop a fixed agenda and to implement it.
At first, volunteers are willing and have a lot of time
available, but then personal engagements and other problems
emerge and end up disturbing the whole agenda of activities.
In the Digital Centers, for example, which they rely on
the work of volunteers, monitors have been hired to ensure
the continuity of the work.
Factors Contributing to the Success of Child
Mission
Several factors have together resulted in the success of
the organization. First and foremost, the Bolsa Escola is
an excellent strategy that proved its efficiency in fighting
the perpetuation of the poverty cycle when it was established
in the Federal District, with huge potential for immediate
and satisfactory impacts and results upon families, communities
and children.
The second most important factor was the relentless search
for support from international organizations, such as UNICEF,
UNESCO, ILO, USAID, NOVIB and others, which have played
an important role in the dissemination of the Bolsa-Escola
Cidadã program. These institutional partners have
conferred the necessary credibility on the project.
The third factor to be highlighted is the support given
by the media. In this respect, its honorary president, Cristovam
Buarque, was very important as an intellectual, moral and
political figure, in addition to being a passionate advocate
of education for all.
The fourth important factor was the efficiency with which
Child Mission acted to aggregate companies around the idea
of social responsibility. In addition to acquiring the necessary
resources for granting the Bolsa-Escola Cidadã, this
enabled the development of good cooperation between projects
and local government. Even without public resources, the
partnership with the private sector allowed the strategy
to become well-known and even debated at federal level.
The fifth essential factor was the definition of its role,
with clarity about its limits. The organization does not
aim to solve all the communities’ problems. The maintenance
of a small, easily-managed team, and the quality of the
work carried out are criteria that have been maintained.
Another fundamental was confidence in the principle of
partnerships. The local managing organizations had already
done good work in their communities, which facilitated the
development of the actions and allowed the construction
of a network helping to ensure social control and better
sharing of responsibilities. Thus, decentralization of the
project’s operations was of great value. The control
systems used by Child Mission do not require a great technical
apparatus. Every month, the necessary resources are transferred
to the municipalities, more specifically to the managing
organizations. The activities of the Voluntary Missions,
and the planning of training courses, are organized at the
headquarters of the managing organizations.
At the national level, the effective political action carried
out by Child Mission has, without doubt, brought about the
establishment of the Bolsa-Escola program throughout the
country by the federal government. The organization has
always been proactive in the advocacy of the Bolsa-Escola
and has demonstrated, at the local level, the feasibility
of its application.
How can it be Reproduced?
Many of the characteristics outlined above, especially
decentralization, make it easier to reproduce the program.
For the implantation of the Bolsa-Escola in other countries,
consideration must be given to the following guidelines:
Evaluate whether the country has the
necessary infrastructure meet increased demand for schools.
Define the criterion that will be
used for selection the target-group, or selection the
families, which could be done by partner NGOs or the community
itself.
Establish a schedule for setting up
the program.
Establish the amount of the grants.
Define the routines for monitoring
and overseeing class attendance checking.
Define how the Bolsa-Escola will be
paid.
Lessons Learned
Among the lessons learned by Child Mission through its
years of action, two should be highlighted:
The organization must be as close
as possible to its collaborators, permanently improving
its relationship with volunteers and donors. It is essential
to keep clear communication channels with these partners,
because they are vital for the continuity of the project.
It means watching over the transparency of the actions,
divulging all the advances achieved and difficulties found.
The creation of the Council composed of collaborators,
financiers and friends of the project, which convenes
regularly, contributes to the provision of information
and collection of suggestions and criticism.
Quality and efficiency of the information,
both that made available to society in general and information
for communities in the project. It is not enough simply
to provide conditions for families to keep their children
in school. The beneficiaries must understand the importance
of this measure. The communities must understand that
they have the legal right, expressed in the Federal Constitution,
to have their children protected by the State. And they
must fight to have this right met.
Child Mission firmly believes that wherever there is social
sensitivity and political will to stop the proliferation
of poverty and social inequality, actions such as it develops
are possible. If all act together to search for a solution
and an alternative to exclusion and poverty, the world will
be a better place for future generations.
Address: SCLN 107 Bloco C, Sala 101
Brasília. DF
Brazil
Zip Code: 70.743-530
Telephone: (55) 61.273.4620
Homepage: www.missaocrianca.org.br
Names of key individuals
Gladys Pessoa de Vasconcelos Buarque - President
Célio Carlos da Silva - Executive Secretary
Bibliography
Aguiar and Araújo, M. and C.
Bolsa Escola - resumo executivo. Brasilia, Brazil: UNESCO,
2002.
Aguiar and Araújo, M and C.
“Bolsa Escola - educação para enfrentar
a pobreza”. Brasilia, Brazil: UNESCO, 2002.
Child Mission. “What is Bolsa
Escola ?” - Child Mission. Brasilia, Brazil., 2001.
Child Mission. “O que você
pode fazer para ajudar a erradicar o trabalho infantil
no Brasil” - Child Mission. Brasilia, Brazil, 2001.
Vellasco, D. “Dealing with Educational
and Inequality in Brazil: a case study from Brasilia".
Social Policy and Administration Department, London School
of Economics and Political Sciences, London, 1997.
Direct interview with Executive-Secretary
Célio Silva.
In loco interviews carried out by the
consultant.
Notes
1. Aguiar and Araújo, M. and C.
Bolsa Escola - resumo executivo Brasilia, Brazil: UNESCO,
2002. 2. Aguiar and Araújo, M and C. “Bolsa
Escola - educação para enfrentar a pobreza”.
Brasilia, Brazil: UNESCO, 2002.